Perpustakaan FAH UIN Alauddin

  • Home
  • Information
  • News
  • Help
  • Librarian
  • Member Area
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of THE QUALITY OF TRANSLATION BY MACHINE AND HUMAN IN
SELECTED “SUKSES DAILY” VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE

(COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS)
Bookmark Share

Text

THE QUALITY OF TRANSLATION BY MACHINE AND HUMAN IN SELECTED “SUKSES DAILY” VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS)

Muh. Ikram - Personal Name;

This study aims to compare the translation quality between machine and
human, particularly in the context of selected “Sukses Daily” videos on YouTube.
In achieving these goals, this research uses mixed-method approaches. It is
analyzed based on the Translation Quality Assessment (TQA) model by Nababan
et al. (2012): accuracy, acceptability, and readability. Meanwhile, the data was
collected through questionnaires distributed to the informants.
The analysis shows that human translation generally outperforms machine
translation in terms of accuracy, acceptability, and readability. The research finds
that human translation is better at understanding complex context, recognizing
nuances in language, and adapting to the appropriate language style for the target
language. The research evidence shows that out of 43 data that have been
evaluated, machine translation has an average score for the accuracy of the
translation of 1.48 out of 3. The average score for the acceptability of the
translation is 1.81 out of 3, and the average score for readability is 1.99 out of 3.
Overall, the average score of the machine translation quality is 1.7, which
indicates that the translation has poor quality. Meanwhile, the human translation
has an average score of 1.65 out of 3 for accuracy. The average score for the
acceptability of the translation is 2.52 out of 3, and the average score for
readability is 2.72 out of 3. Overall, the average score of human translation quality
is 2.61, which indicates that the translation has good quality. This research is
expected to provide insights into the quality of machine translation and human
translation on YouTube, and to offer new ideas for future researchers to further
investigate the specific quality of machine or human translation. The researchers
hope that this study will contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field
of translation and encourage further research in this area.


Availability
#
Perpustakaan FAH UIN Alauddin BSI 2023 MUH t
BSI 2023 MUH t
Available but not for loan - No Loan
Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
BSI 2023 MUH t
Publisher
Makassar : Fak. Adab & Humaniora UIN Alauddin., 2023
Collation
xv, 87 hlm.; 30 cm
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
-
Classification
BSI 2023 MUH t
Content Type
-
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
-
Subject(s)
Human Translation
Translation Quality Assessment
Machine Translation
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
-
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
  • The Quality of Translation by Machine and Human in Selected “Sukses Daily” Videos on Youtube (Comparative Analysis)
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Perpustakaan FAH UIN Alauddin
  • Information
  • Services
  • Librarian
  • Member Area

About Us

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject

Keep SLiMS Alive Want to Contribute?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Powered by SLiMS
Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search
Where do you want to share?